![]() |
|
|
QUALITY COUNTS: A Poor Sales Call May Be Worse than No Sales Call Every organization is looking for ways to increase results. Many have tried extending new product lines, adding salespeople, changing sales compensation, or even restructuring of the sales organization. These options are usually expensive, difficult to implement, and may not result in a permanent increase. As the sales cycle of selling larger projects and services increases in complexity and length, it has become important that salespeople and sales managers improve results. For years traditional organizations have tried to increase prospecting and sales activities as a way to increase results. That may not be the answer. In industries with short and simple sales cycles this is effective. However, once a salesperson or sales team is at an adequate level of prospecting activity and account development, the payback from increasing activity tends to decrease dramatically. As a matter of fact, some have tried to increase their sales activities by adding more and more prospects only to find they cannot do what is necessary to move prospects through the sales cycle at the pace the prospect requires, due to the time and effort required. The second way to increase sales is to improve sales skills and effectiveness. The ability to move a prospect through the sales cycle is directly related to the knowledge and the sales skills of the salesperson. Its not just doing a lot; it is doing a lot of the right things and doing them very well. The quality level of the sales skills and activities will determine the quantity of sales and new clients obtained. If you want to increase results, is increasing sales activities or increasing the sales skills the best approach? Lets examine the return on the investment of your time and effort to increase sales activities and sales skills. Many technically oriented organizations make a strategic mistake. They confuse technical knowledge of the product or industry with sales skills. Technical knowledge may be needed to support customers and even design systems, but it is sales skills that uncover needs, communicate benefits, relate results, and close accounts. To determine the payback for improving either quality or quantity look at a typical situation where an individual might generate ten prospects and from this base presents five proposals which result in one closed or new account. If the salesperson simply increases prospecting activity by 20 percent, the activity will generate 20 percent more qualified prospects, which will flow through the sales cycle at the same rate resulting in a 20 percent increase in sales. A 20 percent increase in prospecting activity produces the same gain in results throughout the cycle, all else being the same, such as prospect quality and quality of sales activities. Focusing on increasing activity has distinct limitations especially in a down economy. There is usually a fixed number of prospects in a specific territory or market and if they are handled poorly, it becomes even more difficult to get their interest and commitment a second time. Even in selling, where everyone is a prospect, there is a limited amount of selling time a salesperson can utilize in a day or month. Dont think I am saying to disregard the need for an adequate level of activity because it is essential that each salesperson in the sales organization have an ample supply of qualified prospects. Without them it is impossible to reach even modest sales objectives. An ample supply of prospects will ensure that the salesperson does not put all of his or her eggs in one basket and they have the opportunity to sell in a less stressful environment. Experience has shown that if a salesperson perceives he or she has to get a sale, his or her selling effectiveness is significantly reduced by a high stress level. Another method for increasing sales results is to improve the sales skills and knowledge of the individual and of the entire organization to increase the quality of the sales call and its resulting effectiveness. How effective a salesperson and organization is in moving a prospect through the sales cycle will greatly affect the level of success. The longer and more complex the sales cycle, the more sales call quality affects results. Many salespeople spend a great deal of time learning technical topics or on products that have a short life-span. As a result, training is very perishable. Products change and knowledge is lost. Unfortunately, many hours everyday are devoted to building perishable knowledge rather than building durable sales skills that easily transfer from one product, account, and situation to another. It has been estimated that 85 percent or more of the time spent in training today is devoted to product and technical knowledge rather than the durable, long-lasting, sales skills of uncovering prospects needs and relating products to those needs and communicating results that will close sales. The sales skills of uncovering a prospects needs, relating a solution to that need, and helping the prospect understand the benefit from fulfilling that need is essential to success. A key question is, If these skills are critical why arent more time and resources spent on developing them? The answer may be that it is difficult to develop these skills in normal work settings. Building sales skills requires specific training content that may not be available in the average organization, and improving call effectiveness may require more insight than the personnel has. If a salesperson develops better sales skills and is more effective at each step of the sale, results will dramatically increase. For example, if a salesperson converts more prospecting activities to qualified prospects, they are better able to move qualified prospects to the next step of the cycle and, ultimately, close more effectively. Then results will catapult. An increase in sales skills and sales effectiveness produces a much greater return than the same increase in sales activity. In our previous example, if a salesperson begins with the same amount of prospecting activities but is able to convert 20 percent more of the potential prospects to qualified prospects, and 20% more at each step to the close, the increase will be compounded throughout the sales cycle. If the sales cycle has just three-steps (most large accounts are much larger) a 73 percent increase in sales results will be generated if the salesperson is 20% better at each step. The age-old question that organizations wrestle with is, How can I afford to take salespeople out of the field and divert their time from making calls to develop sales effectiveness? The answer is, If a one-week investment in time can improve a salespersons effectiveness 10 to 20 percent, the payback sale will be in 3-4 months. If the effectiveness can be increases 25%, the payback will be in a month. After the payback, the dividend will continue because improving sales skills and sales effectiveness is durable or evergreen. With todays competitive marketplace and limited number of prospects it is important for salespeople to not continue to making sales calls unless they are highly effective. Candidly assess the level of sales skills of the calls each salesperson and the sales organization is conducting. With all the time, energy, and resources invested in getting new clients, can you afford anything less than highly effective sales calls? For more information on how to book Wayne for your next event contact us - Click Here Outlaw Group, Inc. 900 Johnnie Dodds Blvd. Suite 115 Charleston, SC 29464 800.347.9361 fax 843.881.1758 info@outlawgroup.com www.outlawgroup.com ~ www.wayneoutlaw.com ~ www.smartstaffing.net |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|